Congenital Hepatic Fibrosis Panel

52 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants

Ideal for patients presenting with congenital or early onset hepatic fibrosis including those with a clinical suspicion of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney and liver disease, Bardet-Biedl syndrome or Joubert syndrome.

Analysis methods Availability Number of genes Test code CPT codes
PLUS
SEQ
DEL/DUP
4 weeks 52 GHC0065 SEQ 81404
SEQ 81406
SEQ 81407
DEL/DUP 81479

Summary

ICD codes
Commonly used ICD-10 code(s) when ordering the Congenital Hepatic Fibrosis Panel

ICD-10 Disease
Q87.89 Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Q04.3 Joubert syndrome
Q61.19 Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney and liver disease

Sample requirements:

  • EDTA blood, min. 1 ml
  • Purified DNA, min. 3μg
  • Saliva (Oragene DNA OG-500 kit)

Label the sample tube with your patient’s name, date of birth and the date of sample collection. Note that we do not accept DNA samples isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue.

About

Congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) is a rare, mostly autosomal recessive condition that presents at birth and affects the liver. CHF rarely occurs as an isolated problem and is typically associated with ciliopathy syndromes that affect the kidneys. In many cases gross malformations are phenotypically pathognomonic such such as anencephaly in Meckel syndrome and the liver fibrosis is only a minor feature. The ciliopathy syndromes with hepatic fibrosis include Bardet-Biedl syndrome and Joubert syndrome. In contrast to ciliopathies, polycystic kidney disease affects relatively few organ systems other than liver cysts and hepatic fibrosis which present regularly. Typical liver abnormalities include an enlarged liver, portal hypertension and hepatic fibrosis. Gastrointestinal bleeding, splenomegaly and hypersplenism along with low platelet count may be present in the early stages of the disease. The prevalence of Bardet-Biedl syndrome is 1:13,500-140,000, Joubert syndrome 1:80,000-100,000 and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney and liver disease 1:10,000-40,000.

Panel Content

Genes in the Congenital Hepatic Fibrosis Panel and their clinical significance

Gene Associated phenotypes Inheritance ClinVar HGMD
AHI1Joubert syndromeAR5890
ANKS6NephronophthisisAR612
ARL6Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosaAR1321
ARL13BJoubert syndromeAR1010
B9D1Meckel syndromeAR79
B9D2Meckel syndromeAR84
BAATHypercholanemia, familialAR37
BBS1Bardet-Biedl syndromeAR49103
BBS2Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosaAR3590
BBS4Bardet-Biedl syndromeAR2152
BBS5Bardet-Biedl syndromeAR1430
BBS7Bardet-Biedl syndromeAR1639
BBS9Bardet-Biedl syndromeAR2451
BBS10Bardet-Biedl syndromeAR59100
BBS12Bardet-Biedl syndromeAR1257
C5ORF42Orofaciodigital syndrome, Joubert syndromeAR84100
CC2D2ACOACH syndrome, Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndromeAR7590
CEP41Joubert syndromeAR/Digenic710
CEP164NephronophthisisAR89
CEP290Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Leber congenital amaurosis, Joubert syndrome, Senior-Loken syndrome, Meckel syndromeAR117280
DCDC2DeafnessAR139
GLIS2NephronophthisisAR33
INPP5EJoubert syndrome, Mental retardation, truncal obesity, retinal dystrophy, and micropenis (MORM syndrome)AR2448
INVSNephronophthisisAR1233
IQCB1Senior-Loken syndromeAR2141
KIF7Acrocallosal syndrome, Hydrolethalus syndrome, Al-Gazali-Bakalinova syndrome, Joubert syndromeAR/Digenic2340
LIPAWolman disease, Cholesterol ester storage diseaseAR1384
MKKSBardet-Biedl syndrome, McKusick-Kaufman syndromeAR1859
MKS1Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Meckel syndromeAR4352
NEK8NephronophthisisAR1416
NPHP1Nephronophthisis, Joubert syndrome, Senior-Loken syndromeAR1673
NPHP3Nephronophthisis, Renal-hepatic-pancreatic dysplasia, Meckel syndromeAR3174
NPHP4Nephronophthisis, Senior-Loken syndromeAR15109
NR1H4Cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic 5AR65
OFD1Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosa, Orofaciodigital syndrome, Joubert syndromeXL142157
PKD2Polycystic kidney diseaseAD44309
PKHD1Polycystic kidney diseaseAR169528
RPGRIP1LCOACH syndrome, Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndrome, Retinal degeneration in ciliopathy, modifierAD/AR3645
TCTN1Joubert syndromeAR66
TCTN2Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndromeAR1913
TCTN3Orofaciodigital syndrome (Mohr-Majewski syndrome), Joubert syndromeAR910
TMEM67Nephronophthisis, COACH syndrome, Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndromeAR87157
TMEM138Joubert syndromeAR68
TMEM216Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndromeAR138
TMEM231Joubert syndrome, Meckel syndromeAR1119
TMEM237Joubert syndromeAR711
TRIM32Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Muscular dystrophy, limb-girdleAR1316
TTC8Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Retinitis pigmentosaAR516
TTC21BShort-rib thoracic dysplasia, Nephronophthisis, Asphyxiating thoracic dysplasia (ATD; Jeune)AR1753
WDR19Retinitis pigmentosa, Nephronophthisis, Short -rib thoracic dysplasia with or without polydactyly, Senior-Loken syndrome, Cranioectodermal dysplasia (Levin-Sensenbrenner) type 1, Cranioectodermal dysplasia (Levin-Sensenbrenner) type 2, Asphyxiating thoracic dysplasia (ATD; Jeune)AD/AR3028
WDR35Cranioectodermal dysplasia (Levin-Sensenbrenner) type 1, Cranioectodermal dysplasia (Levin-Sensenbrenner) type 2, Short rib-polydactyly syndrome type 5AR2628
ZNF423Nephronophthisis, Joubert syndromeAD/AR107

Non-coding variants covered by the panel

Gene Genomic location HG19 HGVS RefSeq RS-number
BBS1Chr11:66291682c.1110+329C>TNM_024649.4rs571170303
BBS1Chr11:66291105c.951+58C>TNM_024649.4
BBS4Chr15:73001820c.77-216delANM_033028.4rs113994189
BBS5Chr2:170354110c.619-27T>GNM_152384.2
CEP290Chr12:88494960c.2991+1655A>GNM_025114.3rs281865192
CEP290Chr12:88462434c.6012-12T>ANM_025114.3rs752197734
OFD1ChrX:13773245c.1130-22_1130-19delAATTNM_003611.2rs312262865
OFD1ChrX:13768358c.935+706A>GNM_003611.2rs730880283
PKHD1Chr6:51747238c.7350+653A>GNM_138694.3
TMEM231Chr16:75575364c.824-11T>CNM_001077416.2
WDR35Chr2:20182313c.143-18T>ANM_001006657.1
WDR35Chr2:20151929c.1434-684G>TNM_001006657.1

Panel Update

Genes added

  • ANKS6
  • B9D1
  • B9D2
  • BAAT
  • C5ORF42
  • CEP164
  • CEP41
  • DCDC2
  • GLIS2
  • INPP5E
  • KIF7
  • LIPA
  • NEK8
  • NR1H4
  • TCTN1
  • TCTN2
  • TCTN3
  • TMEM138
  • TMEM216
  • TMEM231
  • TMEM237
  • WDR19
  • ZNF423

Genes removed

Test strength and Limitations

The strengths of this test include:

  • CAP and ISO-15189 accreditations covering all operations at GHC Genetics including all Whole Exome Sequencing, NGS panels and confirmatory testing
  • CLIA-certified personnel performing clinical testing in a CLIA-certified laboratory
  • Powerful sequencing technologies, advanced target enrichment methods and precision bioinformatics pipelines ensure superior analytical performance
  • Careful construction of clinically effective and scientifically justified gene panels
  • Our Nucleus online portal providing transparent and easy access to quality and performance data at the patient level
  • Our publically available analytic validation demonstrating complete details of test performance
  • ~1,500 non-coding disease causing variants in GHC WES assay (please see below ‘Non-coding disease causing variants covered by this panel’)
  • Our rigorous variant classification based on modified ACMG variant classification scheme
  • Our systematic clinical interpretation workflow using proprietary software enabling accurate and traceable processing of NGS data
  • Our comprehensive clinical statements

Test limitations The following exons are not included in the panel as they are not sufficiently covered with high quality sequence reads: *PPA2* (11, 12). Genes with partial, or whole gene, segmental duplications in the human genome are marked with an asterisk if they overlap with the UCSC pseudogene regions. The technology may have limited sensitivity to detect variants in genes marked with these symbols (please see the Panel content table above).

This test does not detect the following:
  • Complex inversions
  • Gene conversions
  • Balanced translocations
  • Mitochondrial DNA variants
  • Repeat expansion disorders unless specifically mentioned
  • Non-coding variants deeper than ±20 base pairs from exon-intron boundary unless otherwise indicated (please see above Panel Content / non-coding variants covered by the panel).

This test may not reliably detect the following:
  • Low level mosaicism
  • Stretches of mononucleotide repeats
  • Indels larger than 50bp
  • Single exon deletions or duplications
  • Variants within pseudogene regions/duplicated segments

The sensitivity of this test may be reduced if DNA is extracted by a laboratory other than GHC Genetics.

For additional information, please refer to the Test performance section and see our Analytic Validation.

Test Performance

The GHC Genetics panel covers classical genes associated with Brugada syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), cardiac arrest underlying cardiac condition, cardiac arrest cause unspecified, syncope and collapse, abnormal ECG, Long QT syndrome, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and Short QT syndrome. The genes on the panel have been carefully selected based on scientific literature, mutation databases and our experience.

Our panels are sliced from our high-quality whole exome sequencing data. Please see our sequencing and detection performance table for different types of alterations at the whole exome level (Table).

Assays have been validated for different starting materials including EDTA-blood, isolated DNA (no FFPE), saliva and dry blood spots (filter card) and all provide high-quality results. The diagnostic yield varies substantially depending on the assay used, referring healthcare professional, hospital and country. GHC Genetics’ Plus Analysis (Seq+Del/Dup) maximizes the chance to find a molecular genetic diagnosis for your patient although Sequence Analysis or Del/Dup Analysis may be a cost-effective first line test if your patient’s phenotype is suggestive of a specific mutation type.

Performance of GHC Genetics Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) assay.
All individual panels are sliced from WES data.

Sensitivity % (TP/(TP+FN) Specificity %
Single nucleotide variants 99.65% (412,456/413,893) >99.99%
Insertions, deletions and indels by sequence analysis
1-10 bps 96.94% (17,070/17,608) >99.99%
11-50 bps 99.07% (957/966) >99.99%
Copy number variants (exon level dels/dups)
Clinical samples (small CNVs, n=52)
1 exon level deletion 92.3% (24/26) NA
2 exons level deletion/duplication 100.0% (11/11) NA
3-7 exons level deletion/duplication 93.3% (14/15) NA
Microdeletion/-duplication sdrs (large CNVs, n=37))
Size range (0.1-47 Mb) 100% (37/37)
Simulated CNV detection
2 exons level deletion/duplication 90.98% (7,357/8,086) 99.96%
5 exons level deletion/duplication 98.63% (7,975/8,086) 99.98%
The performance presented above reached by WES with the following coverage metrics
Mean sequencing depth at exome level 174x
Nucleotides with >20x sequencing coverage (%) 99.4%

Our mission is to improve the quality of the sequencing process and each modification is followed by our standardized validation process. Detection of Del/Dup of several genes is by MLPA analysis (MS Holland). All genes are performed by CNV analysis through the genome depending on exon size, sequencing coverage and sequence content. We have validated the assays for different starting materials including isolated DNA from EDTA blood that provide high-quality results.

Bioinformatics & clinical interpretation

The sequencing data generated in our laboratory is analysed by our bioinformatic pipeline, integrating state-of-the art algorithms and industry-standard software solutions. We use also JSI medical systems software for sequencing data analysis. JSI medical systems is a certified system offering sophisticated bioinformatic software solutions covering a wide field of sequencing techniques.

Incorporation of rigorous quality control steps throughout the workflow of the pipeline ensures the consistency, validity and accuracy of results.

Every pathogenic or probably pathogenic variant is confirmed by the Sanger sequencing method. Sanger sequencing is also used occasionally with other variants reported in the statement. In the case of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) we do not recommend risk stratification based on the genetic finding. The analysis of detected variants was performed on the basis of the reference database of polymorphisms and international mutation databases: UMD, LOVD and ClinVar.

The consequence of variants in coding and splice regions are estimated using Alamut software. The Alamut database contains more than 28000 coding genes, non-protein coding genes and pseudogenes. This database (shared with the high throughput annotation engine for NGS data, Alamut Batch) is frequently updated. Information comes from different public databases such as NCBI, EBI, and UCSC, as well as other sources including gnomAD, ESP, Cosmic, ClinVar, or HGMD and CentoMD (for those a separate subscription from Qiagen/Biobase and Centogene respectively is required). Alamut Visual finds information about nucleotide conservation data through many vertebrates’ species, with the phastCons and phyloP scores, amino acid conservation data through orthologue alignments and information on protein domains.

Moreover, we integrate several missense variant pathogenicity prediction tools and algorithms such as SIFT, PolyPhen, AlignGVGD or MutationTaster. It also offers a window dedicated to the in silico study of variants’ effect on RNA splicing, allowing the assessment of their potential impact on splice junctions and visualization of cryptic or de novo splice sites. Impact on splicing regulation is also assessed.


Clinical interpretation

At GHC Genetics our geneticists and clinicians, who together evaluate the results from the sequence analysis pipeline in the context of phenotype information provided in the requisition form, prepare the clinical report. We recommend an interpretation of the findings of this molecular genetic analysis, including subsequent oncological consultation for the patient in the context of genetic counselling for the patient.

We strive to continuously monitor current genetic literature identifying new relevant information and findings and adapting them to our diagnostics. This enables relevant novel discoveries to be rapidly translated and adopted into our ongoing diagnostics development without delay. The undertaking of such comprehensive due diligence ensures that our diagnostic panels and clinical statements are the most up-to-date on the market.

Variant classification is the corner stone of clinical interpretation and resulting patient management decisions. Minor modifications were made to increase reproducibility of the variant classification and improve the clinical validity of the report. Our experience with tens of thousands of clinical cases analysed at our laboratories enables us to further develop the industry standard.

The final step in the analysis of sequence variants is confirmation of variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic using bi-directional Sanger sequencing. Variant(s) fulfilling all of the following criteria are not Sanger confirmed: 1) the variant quality score is above the internal threshold for a true positive call, 2) an unambiguous IGV in-line with the variant call and 3) previous Sanger confirmation of the same variant three times at GHC Genetics. Reported variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are confirmed with bi-directional Sanger sequencing only if the quality score is below our internally defined quality score for true positive call. Reported copy number variations with a size >10 exons are confirmed by orthogonal methods such as qPCR if the specific CNV has been seen less than three times at GHC Genetics.

Our clinical statement includes tables for sequencing and copy number variants that include basic variant information (genomic coordinates, HGVS nomenclature, zygosity, allele frequencies, in silico predictions, OMIM phenotypes and classification of the variant). In addition, the statement includes detailed descriptions of the variant, gene and phenotype(s) including the role of the specific gene in human disease, the mutation profile, information about the gene’s variation in population cohorts and detailed information about related phenotypes. We also provide links to the references used, and mutation databases to help our customers further evaluate the reported findings if desired. The conclusion summarizes all of the existing information and provides our rationale for the classification of the variant.

Identification of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in dominant disorders or their combinations in different alleles in recessive disorders are considered molecular confirmation of the clinical diagnosis. In these cases, family member testing can be used for risk stratification within the family. In the case of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), we do not recommend family member risk stratification based on the VUS result. Furthermore, in the case of VUS, we do not recommend the use of genetic information in patient management or genetic counselling.

Our Clinical interpretation team analyses millions of variants from thousands of individuals with rare diseases. Thus, our database, and our understanding of variants and related phenotypes, is growing by leaps and bounds. Our laboratories are therefore well positioned to re-classify previously reported variants as new information becomes available. If a variant previously reported by GHC Genetics is re-classified, our laboratories will issue a follow-up statement to the original ordering health care provider at no additional cost.